•  Consumer Loans

LendingRobot Review

LendingRobot is a roboadvisor offering automated investments across multiple P2P lending platforms, including LendingClub and Prosper


  • Investment Types: Consumer Loans
  • Sectors: P2P Loans
  • Minimum Investment: $25
  • Open to all investors
  • No minimums (for their "Classic" product)
  • "Classic" product open to all investors
  • Fantastic blog content
  • Consolidated and very readable reporting and automated investing across platforms
  • User-friendly yet powerful tools for adjusting investment risk profile
  • Need to invest in many, many notes (100+) to achieve diversification
  • P2P loans are unsecured
  • High minimum investment


This LendingRobot Review will help you learn more about LendingRobot's investment offerings, including how the alternative investments on LendingRobot are structured, and what your potential returns might be. You can read more about the criteria we use to review investment platforms here.

Although LendingClub and Prosper both offer automated investing options, LendingRobot spotted an opportunity to provide (what they would assert is) a better set of loan selection tools and risk models, as well as the ability to monitor and manage investment across P2P loan platforms.

Recently, LendingRobot announced they are merging with their biggest competitor in the space, NSR Invest.

Types of investments LendingRobot offers

With LendingRobot’s “Classic” product, you’re using their platform to in turn invest in loans (notes) on LendingClub and Prosper (as well as FundingCircle, though FundingCircle is only open to accredited investors and has much higher minimums than LendingClub or Prosper). Essentially, their value proposition is that using LendingRobot can help you outperform investing directly, and do so enough to more than make up for the 0.45% annual fee they charge for the service.

What do you get when investing with LendingRobot?

When you invest in notes on LendingClub or Prosper, you’re buying a a fractional interest in a consumer loan. The underlying notes on LendingClub and Prosper are graded by risk level.

How does LendingRobot make money?

For the Classic product, LendingRobot charges 0.45% as an AUM fee (billed monthly). They do not charge any fees for the first $5,000 invested. Their newer products (open only to accredited investors) have different and varying fees.

Potential returns and cashflow

LendingRobot asserts that they can help investors outperform returns from investing directly in LendingClub or Prosper, though fundamentally the return drivers are the same, which is the particular diversification and risk profile of the loans you’ve invested in.

Borrower payments are collected montly and deposited regularly into your account on each platform, where they can optionally be automatically re-invested.

Breadth of offerings on LendingRobot

Both LendingClub and Prosper process a large volume of loans, so there is usually a wide selection of available notes. In some cases there may not be notes available that meet your specific criteria, though the automated investing option will match you with a note that meets your criteria when one becomes available.

Regulatory framework

The regulatory framework for P2P lenders is quite distinct from the rest of the investment crowdfunding ecosystem. The borrower side of the equation is regulated via the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission, while the lender/investor side is regulated by the SEC. As part of the process in place, each loan is registered and filed with the SEC to comply with securities regulations.

Once a borrower applies for a loan, the platform grades the loan quality and files a detailed disclosure with the SEC. The loan is then made available to prospective investors; once enough investors express interest, the loan is funded.

While both LendingClub and Prosper do perform credit checks, much of the application is information supplied by the borrower and not independently verified.

(Here’s much more on the gory details of the rather-complicated regulatory landscape around P2P lending from Harvard Business Law Review.)

This review was first published on 25 March 2017.

Our Rating


More about our ratings

Share this review:

  • Sponsored content
  • Other Investment Opportunities

    CEO interviews